Jealousy Reconsidered: A Reply to
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Psychophysiological responses to imagined infidelity: the specific innate modular view of jealousy reconsidered.
Three studies measured psychophysiological reactivity (heart rate, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity) while participants imagined a mate's infidelity. The specific innate modular theory of gender differences in jealousy hypothesizes that men are upset by sexual infidelity and women are upset by emotional infidelity, because of having faced different adaptive challenges (cuckoldry and l...
متن کاملMale and Female Jealousy, Still More Similar than Different: Reply to Sagarin (2005)
Harris (2003b), reviewing evidence for the Jealousy as a Specific Innate Module (JSIM) theory, concluded that overall there is no support for innate sex differences in jealousy over sexual and emotional infidelity. This article responds to Sagarin’s challenges (this issue) by showing (a) JSIM proponents have not advocated Sagarin’s attenuated version of JSIM; (b) studies using continuous measur...
متن کاملPsychopathic personality and racial / ethnic differences reconsidered : a reply to Lynn ( 2002 ) Jennifer
Lynn (2002) argued that psychopathic personality is distributed disproportionately across racial and ethnic groups, and that these putative group differences were likely attributable to genetic factors. Lynn’s analysis is problematic on three primary counts. First, he equates psychopathy with generalized antisocial behavior and social deviance and fails to distinguish longstanding personality-b...
متن کاملDiscussion Notes THE RANDIAN ARGUMENT RECONSIDERED: A REPLY TO CHARLES KING
C RITICAL DISCUSSIONS of the ideas of the philosopher/novelist Ayn Rand are often most interesting, especially in what they say about the critic and about Rand's relation to today's philosophical orthodoxy. In "Life and the Theory of Value," J. Charles King continues the criticism of Rand's ethics undertaken by Robert Nozick in his article, "On the Randian Argument."' Nozick's critique was exam...
متن کاملReply to Hopkins and Cantalupo: Chim- panzee Right-Handedness Reconsidered— Sampling Issues and Data Presentation
Hopkins et al. (2001) deserve much credit for having raised the bar for laterality studies in nonhuman primates by routinely studying such a large number of individuals and by developing well-defined tasks, such as the TUBE task, to try to quantify individual laterality in a reliable way. They also deserve credit for repeating prior studies to assess the consistency of results, because true rep...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Evolutionary Psychology
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1474-7049,1474-7049
DOI: 10.1177/147470491100900112